USE DATA FROM PERIOD: 261.007 367.000 CYLINDER POSITIONS (UNKNOWN=0, CO2 AND O2 KNOWN=1, CO2 ONLY KNOWN=2, DO NOT USE=8, NOT RUN=9): 1 0 2 0 3 1 4 1 5 0 6 0 7 1 8 1 9 0 10 0 11 0 12 1 13 0 14 0 15 9 16 9 NOTES: Unknowns Pos ID Description 1 D269489 Next WAO WSS3 2 D548325 OXYFLUX Calvin TT 5 D753898 OXYFLUX Hobbes low WSS 6 D269491 Next WAO WSS4 9 D753902 OXYFLUX Calvin high WSS 10 D753899 OXYFLUX Calvin very high WSS 11 D548332 OXYFLUX Hobbes high WSS 13 D743657 Next WAO WSS1 / former HBA WSS or TT 14 D073408 Next WAO WSS2 / former HBA WSS or TT Knowns Pos ID SIOCO2 GMDCO2 SIOO2 Description 3 D089507 428.087 428.087 -565.460 CRAM WSS5 4 D801299 381.475 381.475 -486.054 CRAM WSS1 7 D073409 398.707 398.707 -658.410 CRAM WSS2 8 D073419 440.065 440.065 -926.360 CRAM WSS3 12 D073418 413.092 413.092 -782.739 CRAM WSS4 Working Tank D258968 - Running 4x next WAO WSS, 2 of which are also former HBA WSS or TT; 6x OXYFLUX. - Running CRAM WSSes as knowns for CO2 and O2 results. - NB: have not resolved SIO vs GMD CO2 scale - CRAM WSSes currently reporting only a single scale (which?!?). - Lines 13 and 14 now restored to normal. This is 4th run (not counting 15Sep) with brand new line 14 regulator. - Conclusion: as before, unclear. Line 14 std dev is better than previously, but still not really great, and some evidence of zig zag again. - This run with Britt's suggestion of not running line 15. - Also did not help. - Lines 9 and 10: Poor O2 is actually because of very poor CO2. VUV results are in fact fine - reprocess with Picarro CO2 values. - Lines 5 and 11 are also outside of our CO2 calibration scale, so will also be defined on Picarro, requiring revised O2 values.